Paper detail

Topological properties of epidemic aftershock processes

Earthquakes in seismological catalogs and acoustic emission events in lab experiments can be statistically described as a linear Hawkes point process, where the spatio-temporal rate of events is a linear superposition of background intensity and the aftershock clusters triggered by preceding activity. Traditionally, statistical seismology has interpreted this model as the outcome of an epidemic branching process, where one-to-one causal links can be established between mainshocks and aftershocks. Declustering techniques have been used to infer the underlying triggering trees and relate their topological properties with epidemic branching models. Here, we review how the standard Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model extends from the Galton-Watson (GW) branching processes and bridges two extreme cases: Poisson sampling and scale-free power-law trees. We report the most essential topological properties expected in GW epidemic trees: the branching probability, the distribution of tree size, the expected family size, and the relation between average leaf-depth and tree size. We find that such topological properties depend exclusively on two sampling parameters of the standard ETAS model: the average branching ratio $N_b$ and the exponent ratio $α/b$ determining the branching probability distribution. From these results, one can use the memory-less GW as a null-model for empirical triggering processes and assess the validity of the ETAS model to reproduce the statistics of natural and artificial catalogs.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.