Paper detail

Topological Forcing Semantics with Settling

It was realized early on that topologies can model constructive systems, as the open sets form a Heyting algebra. After the development of forcing, in the form of Boolean-valued models, it became clear that, just as over ZF any Boolean-valued model also satisfies ZF, so do Heyting-valued models satisfy IZF, which stands for Intuitionistic ZF, the most direct constructive re-working of the ZF axioms. In this paper, we return to topologies, and introduce a variant model, along with a correspondingly revised forcing or satisfaction relation. The purpose is to prove independence results related to weakenings of the Power Set axiom. The original motivation is earlier work, based on the set of reals, which shows that Exponentiation, in the context of CZF minus Subset Collection, does not suffice to prove that the Dedekind reals form a set. The current semantics is the generalization of that model from R to an arbitrary topological space. It is investigated which set-theoretic principles hold in such models in general. In addition, natural properties of the underlying topological space are shown to imply the validity of stronger such principles.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.