Paper detail

Topological classification of sesquilinear forms: reduction to the nonsingular case

Two sesquilinear forms $Φ:\mathbb C^m\times\mathbb C^m\to \mathbb C$ and $Ψ:\mathbb C^n\times\mathbb C^n\to \mathbb C$ are called topologically equivalent if there exists a homeomorphism $φ:\mathbb C^m\to \mathbb C^n$ (i.e., a continuous bijection whose inverse is also a continuous bijection) such that $Φ(x,y)=Ψ(φ(x),φ(y))$ for all $x,y\in \mathbb C^m$. R.A.Horn and V.V.Sergeichuk in 2006 constructed a regularizing decomposition of a square complex matrix $A$; that is, a direct sum $SAS^*=R\oplus J_{n_1}\oplus\dots\oplus J_{n_p}$, in which $S$ and $R$ are nonsingular and each $J_{n_i}$ is the $n_i$-by-$n_i$ singular Jordan block. In this paper, we prove that $Φ$ and $Ψ$ are topologically equivalent if and only if the regularizing decompositions of their matrices coincide up to permutation of the singular summands $J_{n_i}$ and replacement of $R\in\mathbb C^{r\times r}$ by a nonsingular matrix $R'\in\mathbb C^{r\times r}$ such that $R$ and $R'$ are the matrices of topologically equivalent forms. Analogous results for real and complex bilinear forms are also obtained.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.