Paper detail

Top SU(5) Models: Baryon and Lepton Number Violating Resonances at the LHC

We propose the minimal and renormalizable non-supersymmetric top SU(5) models where the $SU(5)\times SU(3)'_C \times SU(2)'_L \times U(1)'_Y$ gauge symmetry is broken down to the Standard Model (SM) gauge symmetry at the TeV scale. The first two families of the SM fermions are charged under $SU(3)'_C \times SU(2)'_L \times U(1)'_Y$ while the third family is charged under SU(5). In the minimal top SU(5) model, we show that the quark CKM mixing matrix can be generated via dimension-five operators, and the proton decay problem can be solved by fine-tuning the coefficients of the higher dimensional operators at the order of $10^{-4}$. In the renormalizable top SU(5) model, we can explain the quark CKM mixing matrix by introducing vector-like particles, and we do not have proton decay problem. The models give rise to leptoquark and diquark gauge bosons which violate both lepton and baryon numbers involving the third family quarks and leptons. The current experimental limits for these particles is well below the TeV scale. We also discuss the productions and decays of these new gauge bosons, and their ensuing signals, as well as their reach at the LHC.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.