Paper detail

Top quark effects on the scalar sector of the minimal Standard Model

We study effects of the heavy top quark ($m_t \approx 180 GeV$) on the scalar sector of the minimal Standard Model. We construct the effective potential for the scalar doublet, by first taking into account the leading contributions of the top quark loops. Minimizing this potential gives us a condition analogous to the leading-Nc gap equation of the standard ${\bar t}t$-condensation model (Top-mode standard model). This essentially nonperturbative condition leads to a low ultraviolet cutoff $Ł= O(1 TeV)$ in the case when the bare mass $μ$ of the scalar doublet in the tree level potential satisfies $μ^2 = -M^2_0 \leq 0$ and the scalar doublet there is selfinteracting ($λ> 0$). We demand that the scalar selfinteraction behave perturbatively -- in the sense that its 1-loop contributions influence the effective poten- tial distinctly less than those of the Yukawa coupling of the heavy top quark. When we subsequently include the 1-loop contributions of the scalar and the gauge bosonic sectors in a perturbative manner, the results change numerically, but the cutoff $Ł$ remains $O(1 TeV)$. The resulting Higgs mass $M_H$ is then in the range 150-250 GeV. Furthermore, the results of the paper survive even in the case when the square of the bare mass $μ^2$ is positive, as long as $μ^2 \leq O(λv^2)$, where $λ/4!$ is the usual bare coupling parameter of the quartic selfinteraction of the scalars and $v$ is the vacuum expectation value ($v=246.2 \GeV$, $M^2_H \approx λv^2/3$).

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.