Paper detail

Too big, too small or just right? A benchmark assessment of density functional theory for predicting the spatial extent of the electron density of small chemical systems

Multipole moments are the first order responses of the energy to spatial derivatives of the electric field strength. The quality of density functional theory (DFT) prediction of molecular multipole moments thus characterizes errors in modeling the electron density itself, as well as the performance in describing molecules interacting with external electric fields. However, only the lowest non-zero moment is translationally invariant, making the higher order moments origin-dependent. Therefore, instead of using the $3 \times 3$ quadrupole moment matrix, we utilize the translationally invariant $3 \times 3$ matrix of second cumulants (or spatial variances) of the electron density as the quantity of interest (denoted by $\mathcal{K}$). The principal components of ${\mathcal{K}}$ are the square of the spatial extent of the electron density along each axis. A benchmark dataset of the prinicpal components of ${\mathcal{K}}$ for 100 small molecules at the coupled cluster singles and doubles with perturbative triples (CCSD(T)) at the complete basis set (CBS) limit is developed, resulting in 213 independent ${\mathcal{K}}$ components. The performance of 47 popular and recent density functionals is assessed against this Var213 dataset. Several functionals, especially double hybrids, and also SCAN and SCAN0 yield reliable second cumulants, although some modern, empirically parameterized functionals yield more disappointing performance. The H and Be atoms in particular are challenging for nearly all methods, indicating that future functional development could benefit from inclusion of their density information in training or testing protocols.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.