Toledo invariants of Topological Quantum Field Theories

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

We prove that the Fibonacci quantum representations ρg,n:Modg,n→PU(p,q)ρ_{g,n}:\rm{Mod}_{g,n}\to \rm{PU}(p,q) for (g,n)∈{(0,4),(0,5),(1,2),(1,3),(2,1)}(g,n)\in\{(0,4),(0,5),(1,2),(1,3),(2,1)\} are holonomy representations of complex hyperbolic structures on some compactifications of the corresponding moduli spaces Mg,n\mathcal{M}_{g,n}. As a corollary, the forgetful map between the corresponding compactifications of M1,3\mathcal M_{1,3} and M1,2\mathcal M_{1,2} is a surjective holomorphic map between compact complex hyperbolic orbifolds of different dimensions higher than one, giving an answer to a problem raised by Siu. The proof consists in computing their Toledo invariants: we put this computation in a broader context, replacing the Fibonacci representations with any Hermitian modular functor and extending the Toledo invariant to a full series of cohomological invariants beginning with the signature p−qp-q. We prove that these invariants satisfy the axioms of a Cohomological Field Theory and compute the RR-matrix at first order (hence the usual Toledo invariants) in the case of the SU2/SO3\rm{SU}_2/\rm{SO}_3-quantum representations at any level.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.