Paper detail

To Relay or Not To Relay in Cognitive Radio Sensor Networks

Recent works proposed the relaying at the MAC layer in cognitive radio networks whereby the primary packets are forwarded by the secondary node maintaining an extra queue devoted to the relaying function. However, relaying of primary packets may introduce delays on the secondary packets (called secondary delay) and require additional power budget in order to forward the primary packets that is especially crucial when the network is deployed using sensors with limited power resources. To this end, an admission control can be employed in order to manage efficiently the relaying in cognitive radio sensor networks. In this paper, we first analyse and formulate the secondary delay and the required power budget of the secondary sensor node in relation with the acceptance factor that indicates whether the primary packets are allowed to be forwarded or not. Having defined the above, we present the tradeoff between the secondary delay and the required power budget when the acceptance factor is adapted. In the sequel, we formulate an optimization problem to minimize the secondary delay over the admission control parameter subject to a limit on the required power budget plus the constraints related to the stabilities of the individual queues due to their interdependencies observed by the analysis. The solution of this problem is provided using iterative decomposition methods i.e. dual and primal decompositions using Lagrange multipliers that simplifies the original complicated problem resulting in a final equivalent dual problem that includes the initial Karush Kuhn Tucker conditions. Using the derived equivalent dual problem, we obtain the optimal acceptance factor while in addition we highlight the possibilities for extra delay minimization that is provided by relaxing the initial constraints through changing the values of the Lagrange multipliers.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.