Paper detail

To Principles of Quantum Mechanics Development

New insight to the principles of the quantum physics development is given. The correct ways for the construction of new versions of quantum mechanics on the second main postulate base are discussed. The conclusion on the status of the second main postulate is given. Its formulation in all textbooks has to be represented in the form of statement, since the hypothesis of Schrödinger on the existance of the field scalar function, being to be observable quantity, just charge density, is strictly proved for the case of EM-field, the role of which is argued to be decisive for the dynamics of the atomic systems. It is shown, that the field scalar function, being to be the function the only of coordinates and time, actually describes the state of the system. The second main postulate in Schrödinger formulation is mathematically strictly grounded, but in the popular probabilistic form used in modern textbooks on quantum theory it cannot be proved. The probabilistic theatise, proposed by Born is true in a number of special cases, quite correctly indicated by Dirac. The possible ways of the development of quantum theory, based on clear understanding of the origin of corpuscular-wave dualism are analysed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.