Paper detail

To Cool is to Accrete: Analytic Scalings for Nebular Accretion of Planetary Atmospheres

Planets acquire atmospheres from their parent circumstellar disks. We derive a general analytic expression for how the atmospheric mass grows with time $t$, as a function of the underlying core mass $M_{\rm core}$ and nebular conditions, including the gas metallicity $Z$. Planets accrete as much gas as can cool: an atmosphere's doubling time is given by its Kelvin-Helmholtz time. Dusty atmospheres behave differently from atmospheres made dust-free by grain growth and sedimentation. The gas-to-core mass ratio (GCR) of a dusty atmosphere scales as GCR $\propto t^{0.4} M_{\rm core}^{1.7} Z^{-0.4} μ_{\rm rcb}^{3.4}$, where $μ_{\rm rcb} \propto 1/(1-Z)$ (for $Z$ not too close to 1) is the mean molecular weight at the innermost radiative-convective boundary. This scaling applies across all orbital distances and nebular conditions for dusty atmospheres; their radiative-convective boundaries, which regulate cooling, are not set by the external environment, but rather by the internal microphysics of dust sublimation, H$_2$ dissociation, and the formation of H$^-$. By contrast, dust-free atmospheres have their radiative boundaries at temperatures $T_{\rm rcb}$ close to nebular temperatures $T_{\rm out}$, and grow faster at larger orbital distances where cooler temperatures, and by extension lower opacities, prevail. At 0.1 AU in a gas-poor nebula, GCR $\propto t^{0.4} T_{\rm rcb}^{-1.9} M_{\rm core}^{1.6} Z^{-0.4} μ_{\rm rcb}^{3.3}$, while beyond 1 AU in a gas-rich nebula, GCR $\propto t^{0.4} T_{\rm rcb}^{-1.5} M_{\rm core}^1 Z^{-0.4}μ_{\rm rcb}^{2.2}$. We confirm our analytic scalings against detailed numerical models for objects ranging in mass from Mars (0.1 $M_\oplus$) to the most extreme super-Earths (10-20 $M_\oplus$), and explain why heating from planetesimal accretion cannot prevent the latter from undergoing runaway gas accretion.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.