Paper detail

$τ\to μμμ$ at a rate of one out of $10^{14}$ tau decays?

We present in a full analytic form the partial widths for the lepton flavour violating decays $μ^\pm \to e^\pm e^+ e^-$ and $τ^\pm \to \ell^\pm \ell'^{+} \ell'^{-}$, with $\ell,\ell'=μ,e$, mediated by neutrino oscillations in the one-loop diagrams. Compared to the first result by Petcov in [1], obtained in the zero momentum limit $\mathcal{P}\ll m_ν \ll M_W$, we retain full dependence on $\mathcal{P}$, the momenta and masses of external particles, and we determine the branching ratios in the physical limit $m_ν\ll \mathcal{P} \ll M_W$. We show that the claim presented in [2] that the $τ\to \ell \ell' \ell'$ branching ratios could be as large as $10^{-14}$, as a consequence of keeping the $\mathcal{P}$ dependence, is flawed. We find rates of order $10^{-55}$, even smaller than those obtained in the zero momentum limit, as the latter prediction contains an unphysical logarithmic enhancement.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.