Abstract

We present a sample of 151 massive (M∗>1010M⊙M_* > 10^{10}\mathrm{M_\odot}) quiescent galaxies at 2<z<52 < z < 5, based on a sophisticated Bayesian spectral energy distribution fitting analysis of the CANDELS UDS and GOODS-South fields. Our sample includes a robust sub-sample of 61 objects for which we confidently exclude low-redshift and star-forming solutions. We identify 10 robust objects at z>3z>3, of which 2 are at z>4z>4. We report formation redshifts, demonstrating that the oldest objects formed at z>6z > 6, however individual ages from our photometric data have significant uncertainties, typically ∼0.5\sim0.5 Gyr. We demonstrate that the UVJ colours of the quiescent population evolve with redshift at z>3z>3, becoming bluer and more similar to post-starburst galaxies at lower redshift. Based upon this we construct a model for the time-evolution of quiescent galaxy UVJ colours, concluding that the oldest objects are consistent with forming the bulk of their stellar mass at z∼6−7z\sim6-7 and quenching at z∼5z\sim5. We report spectroscopic redshifts for two of our objects at z=3.440z=3.440 and 3.3963.396, which exhibit extremely weak Lyαα emission in ultra-deep VANDELS spectra. We calculate star-formation rates based on these line fluxes, finding that these galaxies are consistent with our quiescent selection criteria, provided their Lyαα escape fractions are >3>3 and >10>10 per cent respectively. We finally report that our highest-redshift robust object exhibits a continuum break at λ∼7000λ\sim7000A in a spectrum from VUDS, consistent with our photometric redshift of zphot=4.72−0.04+0.06z_\mathrm{phot}=4.72^{+0.06}_{-0.04}. If confirmed as quiescent this object would be the highest-redshift known quiescent galaxy. To obtain stronger constraints on the times of the earliest quenching events, high-SNR spectroscopy must be extended to z≳3z\gtrsim3 quiescent objects.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.