Paper detail

Timestomping Vulnerability of Age-Sensitive Gossip Networks

We consider gossip networks consisting of a source that maintains the current version of a file, $n$ nodes that use asynchronous gossip mechanisms to disseminate fresh information in the network, and an oblivious adversary who infects the packets at a target node through data timestamp manipulation, with the intent to replace circulation of fresh packets with outdated packets in the network. We demonstrate how network topology capacitates an adversary to influence age scaling in a network. We show that in a fully connected network, a single infected node increases the expected age from $O(\log n)$ to $O(n)$. Further, we show that the optimal behavior for an adversary is to reset the timestamps of all outgoing packets to the current time and of all incoming packets to an outdated time for the infected node; thereby preventing any fresh information to go into the infected node, and facilitating acceptance of stale information out of the infected node into other network nodes. Lastly for fully connected network, we show that if an infected node contacts only a single node instead of all nodes of the network, the system age can still be degraded to $O(n)$. These show that fully connected nature of a network can be both a benefit and a detriment for information freshness; full connectivity, while enabling fast dissemination of information, also enables fast dissipation of adversarial inputs. We then analyze the unidirectional ring network, the other end of the network connectivity spectrum, where we show that the adversarial effect on age scaling of a node is limited by its distance from the adversary, and the age scaling for a large fraction of the network continues to be $O(\sqrt{n})$, unchanged from the case with no adversary. We finally support our findings with simulations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.