Paper detail

Timescales on which Star Formation Affects the Neutral ISM

Turbulent neutral hydrogen (HI) line widths are often thought to be driven primarily by star formation (SF), but the timescale for converting SF energy to HI kinetic energy is unclear. As a complication, studies on the connection between Hi line widths and SF in external galaxies often use broadband tracers for the SF rate, which must implicitly assume that SF histories (SFHs) have been constant over the timescale of the tracer. In this paper, we compare measures of HI energy to time-resolved SFHs in a number of nearby dwarf galaxies. We find that HI energy surface density is strongly correlated only with SF that occurred 30-40 Myr ago. This timescale corresponds to the approximate lifetime of the lowest mass supernova progenitors (~ 8 Msun). This analysis suggests that the coupling between SF and the neutral ISM is strongest on this timescale, due either to an intrinsic delay between the release of the peak energy from SF or to the coherent effects of many SNe during this interval. At Σ_SFR > 10^-3 Msun yr^-1 kpc^-2, we find a mean coupling efficiency between SF energy and HI energy of ε= 0.11 +/- 0.04 using the 30-40 Myr timescale. However, unphysical efficiencies are required in lower Σ_SFR systems, implying that SF is not the primary driver of HI kinematics at Σ_SFR < 10^-3 Msun yr^-1 kpc^-2.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.