Paper detail

Times, environments and channels of bulge formation in a LambdaCDM cosmology

We analyze predictions from two independently developed galaxy formation models to study the mechanisms, environments, and characteristic times of bulge formation in a LambdaCDM cosmogony. For each model, we test different prescriptions for bulge formation in order to quantify the relative importance of different channels. Our results show that the strong correlation between galaxy and halo mass for central galaxies, and the richer merger history of more massive systems naturally give rise to a strong correlation between galaxy mass and morphology, and between halo mass and morphological type of central galaxies. Large fractions of the bulge mass are acquired through major and minor mergers, but disc instability plays an important role, particularly for intermediate mass galaxies. We find that the modelling of disc instability events, as well as of the galaxy merger times, can affect significantly the timing of bulge formation, and the relative importance of different channels. Bulge dominated galaxies acquire their morphology through major mergers, but this can be modified by cooling of gas from the surrounding hot halo. We find that disc regrowth is a non negligible component of the evolution of bulge dominated galaxies, particularly for low to intermediate masses, and at high redshifts.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.