Paper detail

Timelike conformal fields on closed $3$-manifolds

This paper investigates timelike conformal vector fields on closed Lorentzian $3$-manifolds and shows that, although these fields form a broader class than Killing fields, their behavior in dimension three is nonetheless remarkably rigid. After performing a conformal change of the metric so that the vector field becomes unit and Killing, we analyze the geometry of the flow it generates through the framework of stable Hamiltonian structures and basic cohomology. Our main result proves that any nowhere-vanishing timelike conformal vector field necessarily arises as the Reeb vector field of either a Sasakian structure or a co-Kähler structure. In other words, every such Lorentzian conformal flow is intrinsically "Reeb-like", which forces the underlying geometry to be either contact or cosymplectic. This establishes a striking connection between Lorentzian geometry, Sasakian and co-Kähler structures, and the topology of flows in dimension~$3$.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.