Paper detail

Time-Variation of Newton's Constant and the Age of Globular Clusters

A variation of Newton's constant $G$ over cosmological time scales would modify the main-squence time of globular cluster (GC) stars. We have calculated the evolution of low-mass stars typical for GCs both for standard non-varying $G$ and under the assumption of a linear variation of $G$. The age of the isochrones resulting from the latter models then was chosen such that the isochrones mimicked the standard ones at the turnoff. Assuming that the true age of GCs is between $8$ and $20\,\rm Gyr$, and because their apparent age is between $14$ and $18\,\rm Gyr$, we find that today $-35{\times}10^{-12}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}\la\dot{G}/G\la 7{\times}10^{-12}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$. The upper limit (gravity weaker in the past) is competitive with direct present-day bounds from celestial mechanics. Within independently determined $\dot{G}/G$ limits a time-varying $G$ as an explanation for the discrepancy between the cosmic expansion age and the apparent GC ages is conceivable.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.