Paper detail

Time symmetric Bloch-Nordsieck infrared cancellation

It is usually assumed that the infrared divergences that occur for virtual photons in Feynman diagrams cancel against the corresponding divergences in phase space integrals for the emission of real soft photons. If this were the case then why do the corresponding phase space integrals for the absorption of real soft photons not diverge too, as one might expect on grounds of time-reversal symmetry, and if so what cancels these divergences? We show that this apparent time asymmetry is an artifact of the way that the diagrams are calculated, and we introduce a procedure for such calculations that is manifestly time symmetric. Moreover, we show that it is not mathematically meaningful to distinguish arbitrarily soft massless particles of positive and negative energy.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.