Paper detail

Time Structure of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Sources and Consequences for Multi-messenger Signatures

The latest results on the sky distribution of ultra-high energy cosmic ray sources have consequences for their nature and time structure. If the sources accelerate predominantly nuclei of atomic number A and charge Z and emit continuously, their luminosity in cosmic rays above ~6x10^{19} eV can be no more than a fraction of ~5x10^{-4} Z^{-2} of their total power output. Such sources could produce a diffuse neutrino flux that gives rise to several events per year in neutrino telescopes of km^3 size. Continuously emitting sources should be easily visible in photons below ~100 GeV, but not in TeV gamma-rays which are likely absorbed within the source. For episodic sources that are beamed by a Lorentz factor Gamma, the bursts or flares have to last at least ~0.1 Gamma^{-4} A^{-4} yr. A considerable fraction of the flare luminosity could go into highest energy cosmic rays, in which case the rate of flares per source has to be less than ~5x10^{-3} Gamma^4 A^4 Z^2 yr^{-1}. Episodic sources should have detectable variability both at GLAST and TeV energies, but neutrino fluxes may be hard to detect.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.