Paper detail

Time series analysis of gamma-ray blazars and implications for the central black-hole mass

Radiation from the blazar class of of active galactic nuclei (AGN) exhibits fast time variability which is usually ascribed to instabilities in the emission region near the central supermassive black hole. The variability time scale is generally faster in higher energy region, and data recently provided by the {\it Fermi} Gamma-ray Space Telescope in the GeV energy band enable a detailed study of the temporal behavior of AGN. Due to its wide field-of-view in the scanning mode, most sky regions are observed for several hours per day and daily light curves of many AGN have been accumulated for more than 4 years. In this paper we investigate the time variability of 15 well-detected AGNs by studying the normalized power spectrum density (NPSD) of their light curves in the GeV energy band. One source, 3C 454.3, shows a specific time scale of $6.8\times10^5$ s, and this value suggests, assuming the internal shock model, a mass for the central black hole of $(10^8$--$10^{10})M_\odot$ which is consistent with other estimates. It also indicates the typical time interval of ejected blobs is $(7$--$70)$ times the light crossing time of the Schwarzschild radius.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.