Paper detail

Time-reversal and parity violating superconducting state of Bi_2Sr_2CaCu_20_8

The time-reversal and parity violating superconducting(SC) phase of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 induced by a magnetic field (B), reported by Krishana et al[K. Krishana et al, Science 277, 83 (1997)] over the limited field range of 0.6T < B < 5T, is examined starting with the model free-energy functional predicted by Laughlin [R. B. Laughlin, Physica C 234, 280 (1994)]. On the basis of entropy considerations we show that the passage from the normal to this field-driven SC state at a non-zero temperatures (T) is possible if kBT \leq Δ0 where the zero-temperature gap \Delta0 ~ \hbarv/lB, v is the root-mean-square velocity of the d-wave node, and lB = \surd(\hbar/eB) is the magnetic length. The restriction may be construed as setting lower limit on the required field strength at a given temperature. We find that, over the field range mentioned, the specific heat coefficient exhibits \surd B- and the B-linear dependence (Volovick effect).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.