Paper detail

Time-frequency analysis of the Dirac equation

The purpose of this paper is to investigate several issues concerning the Dirac equation from a time-frequency analysis perspective. More precisely, we provide estimates in weighted modulation and Wiener amalgam spaces for the solutions of the Dirac equation with rough potentials. We focus in particular on bounded perturbations, arising as the Weyl quantization of suitable time-dependent symbols, as well as on quadratic and sub-quadratic non-smooth functions, hence generalizing the results in a recent paper by Kato and Naumkin. We then prove local well-posedness on the same function spaces for the nonlinear Dirac equation with a general nonlinearity, including power-type terms and the Thirring model. For this study we adopt the unifying framework of vector-valued time-frequency analysis as developed by Wahlberg; most of the preliminary results are stated under general assumptions and hence they may be of independent interest.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.