Paper detail

Time evolution of a viscous protoplanetary disk with a free geometry: toward a more self-consistent picture

Observations of protoplanetary disks show that some characteristics seem recurrent, even in star formation regions that are physically distant such as surface mass density profiles varying as $r^{-1}$, or aspect ratios about 0.03 to 0.23. Accretion rates are also recurrently found around $10^{-8} - 10^{-6}~\mathrm{M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}}$ for disks already evolved (Isella et al., 2009, Andrews et al., 2009, 2010). Several models have been developed in order to recover these properties. However, most of them usually simplify the disk geometry if not its mid-plane temperature. This has major consequences for modeling the disk evolution over million years and consequently planet migration. In the present paper, we develop a viscous evolution hydrodynamical numerical code that determines simultaneously the disk photosphere geometry and the mid-plane temperature. We then compare our results of long-term simulations with similar simulations of disks with a constrained geometry along the Chiang & Goldreich (1997) prescription (dlnH/dlnr = 9/7). We find that the constrained geometry models provide a good approximation of the disk surface density evolution. However, they differ significantly regarding the temperature time evolution. In addition, we find that shadowed regions naturally appear at the transition between viscously dominated and radiation dominated regions that falls in the region of planetary formation. We show that $χ$ (photosphere height to pressure scale height ratio) cannot be considered as a constant, consistently with Watanabe et al. (2008). Comparisons with observations show that all disk naturally evolve toward a shallow surface density disk ($Σ\propto r^{-1}$). The mass flux across the disk stabilizes in about 1 million year typically.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.