Paper detail

Time dependent particle production and particle number in cosmological de Sitter space

In this paper we consider the occupation number of induced quasi-particles produced during a time-dependent process using three-different methods: Instantaneous diagonalization, Bogolyubov transformation between two different vacua, and the Unruh-de Witt detector. Here we consider the Hamiltonian for a time-dependent Harmonic oscillator, with time-dependent mass and frequency. We derive the occupation number of the induced quasi-particles using the invariant operator method; in deriving the occupation number we also point out and make the connection between the Functional Schrödinger formalism, quantum kinetic equation, and Bogolyubov transformation between two different Fock space basis at equal times and explain the role in which the invariant operator plays. Using the flat FRW chart of de Sitter spacetime, we show that the different methods lead to different results: Instantaneous diagonalization leads to a power law distribution, while the Bogolyubov transformation and Unruh-de Witt detector both lead to thermal distributions. It is shown that the source of the discrepancy between the instantaneous diagonalization and Bogolyubov methods is the fact that there is no notion of well-defined particles in the out vacuum due to a divergent term. In the Bogolyubov method, this divergent term cancels leading to the thermal distribution, while in the instantaneous diagonalization there is no such cancelation. However, to obtain the thermal distribution in the usual Bogolyubov method, one must use the large mass limit. On physical grounds, one should expect that only the modes which have been allowed to sample the horizon would be thermal, thus in the large mass limit these modes are well within the horizon and, even though they do grow, they remain well within the horizon due to the mass. Thus one should not expect a thermal distribution since the modes won't have a chance to thermalize.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.