Paper detail

Time-dependent Clearance of Cyclosporine in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Population Pharmacokinetic Perspective

Aim The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of cyclosporine (CsA) in renal transplant recipients are patient- and time-dependent. Knowledge of this time-related variability is necessary to maintain or achieve CsA target exposure. Here, we aimed to identify factors explaining variabilities in CsA PK properties and characterise time-dependent clearance (CL/F) by performing a comprehensive analysis of CsA PK factors using population PK (popPK) modelling of long-term follow-up data from our institution. Methods In total, 3,674 whole-blood CsA concentrations from 183 patients who underwent initial renal transplantation were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. The effects of potential covariates were selected according to a previous report and well-accepted theoretical mechanisms. Model-informed individualised therapeutic regimens were also conducted. Results A two-compartment model adequately described the data and the estimated mean CsA CL/F was 32.6 L h-1 (5%). Allometrically scaled body size, haematocrit (HCT) level, CGC haplotype carrier status, and postoperative time may contribute to CsA PK variability. The CsA bioavailability in patients receiving a prednisolone dose (PD) of 80 mg was 20.6% lower than that in patients receiving 20 mg. A significant decrease (52.6%) in CL/F was observed as the HCT increased from 10.5% to 60.5%. The CL/F of the non-CGC haplotype carrier was 14.4% lower than that of the CGC haplotype carrier at 3 months post operation. CsA dose adjustments should be considered in different postoperative periods. Conclusions By monitoring body size, HCT, PD, and CGC haplotype, changes in CsA CL/F over time could be predicted. Such information could be used to optimise CsA therapy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.