Paper detail

Time-dependent amplitude analysis of B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-

We perform a time-dependent amplitude analysis of $B^0 \to K^0_Sπ^+π^-$ decays to extract the CP violation parameters of $f_0(980) K^0_S$ and $ρ^0(770) K^0_S$ and the direct CP asymmetry of $K^{*+}(892) π^-$. The results are obtained from a data sample of $(383 \pm 3) \times 10^6$ $B\bar{B}$ decays, collected with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy $B$ factory at SLAC. We find two solutions, with an equivalent goodness-of-fit. Including systematic and Dalitz plot model uncertainties, the combined confidence interval for values of the CP parameter $β_{eff}$ in $B^0$ decays to $f_0(980) K^0_S$ is $18^o < β_{eff} < 76^o$ at 95% confidence level (C.L). CP conservation in $B^0$ decays to $f_0(980) K^0_S$ is excluded at $3.5σ$ including systematic uncertainties. For $B^0$ decays to $ρ^0(770) K^0_S$, the combined confidence interval is $-9^o < β_{eff} < 57^o$ at 95% C.L. In decays to $K^{*+}(892) π^-$ we measure the direct CP asymmetry to be $A_{CP}=-0.20 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.01 \pm 0.02$. The measured phase difference (including $B^0\bar{B}^0$ mixing) between decay amplitudes of $B^0 \to K^{*+}(892) π^-$ and $\bar{B}^0 \to K^{*-}(892) π^+$, excludes the interval $-137^o < ΔΦ(K^{*+}(892) π^-) < -5^o$ at 95% C.L.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.