Paper detail

Time-Accurate and highly-Stable Explicit operators for stiff differential equations

Unconditionally stable implicit time-marching methods are powerful in solving stiff differential equations efficiently. In this work, a novel framework to handle stiff physical terms implicitly is proposed. Both physical and numerical stiffness originating from convection, diffusion and source terms (typically related to reaction) can be handled by a set of predefined Time-Accurate and highly-Stable Explicit (TASE) operators in a unified framework. The proposed TASE operators act as preconditioners on the stiff terms and can be deployed to any existing explicit time-marching methods straightforwardly. The resulting time integration methods remain the original explicit time-marching schemes, yet with nearly unconditional stability. The TASE operators can be designed to be arbitrarily high-order accurate with Richardson extrapolation such that the accuracy order of original explicit time-marching method is preserved. Theoretical analyses and stability diagrams show that the $s$-stages $s$th-order explicit Runge-Kutta (RK) methods are unconditionally stable when preconditioned by the TASE operators with order $p \leq s$ and $p \leq 2$. On the other hand, the $s$th-order RK methods preconditioned by the TASE operators with order of $p \leq s$ and $p > 2$ are nearly unconditionally stable. The only free parameter in TASE operators can be determined a priori based on stability arguments. Unlike classical implicit methods, the TASE methodology allows for solving non-linear problems with arbitrary order without requiring solving a nonlinear system of equations. A set of benchmark problems with strong stiffness is simulated to assess the performance of the TASE method. Numerical results suggest that the proposed framework preserves the high-order accuracy of the explicit time-marching methods with very-large time steps for all the considered cases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.