Paper detail

Tightness of invariant distributions of a large-scale flexible service system under a priority discipline

We consider large-scale service systems with multiple customer classes and multiple server pools; interarrival and service times are exponentially distributed, and mean service times depend both on the customer class and server pool. It is assumed that the allowed activities (routing choices) form a tree (in the graph with vertices being both customer classes and server pools). We study the behavior of the system under a Leaf Activity Priority (LAP) policy, which assigns static priorities to the activities in the order of sequential "elimination" of the tree leaves. We consider the scaling limit of the system as the arrival rate of customers and number of servers in each pool tend to infinity in proportion to a scaling parameter r, while the overall system load remains strictly subcritical. Indexing the systems by parameter r, we show that (a) the system under LAP discipline is stochastically stable for all sufficiently large r and (b) the family of the invariant distributions is tight on scales $r^{1/2 + ε}$ for all $ε> 0$. (More precisely, the sequence of invariant distributions, centered at the equilibrium point and scaled down by $r^{-(1/2 + ε)}$, is tight.)

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.