Paper detail

Tighter Bounds for Makespan Minimization on Unrelated Machines

We consider the problem of scheduling $n$ jobs to minimize the makespan on $m$ unrelated machines, where job $j$ requires time $p_{ij}$ if processed on machine $i$. A classic algorithm of Lenstra et al. yields the best known approximation ratio of $2$ for the problem. Improving this bound has been a prominent open problem for over two decades. In this paper we obtain a tighter bound for a wide subclass of instances which can be identified efficiently. Specifically, we define the feasibility factor of a given instance as the minimum fraction of machines on which each job can be processed. We show that there is a polynomial-time algorithm that, given values $L$ and $T$, and an instance having a sufficiently large feasibility factor $h \in (0,1]$, either proves that no schedule of mean machine completion time $L$ and makespan $T$ exists, or else finds a schedule of makespan at most $T + L/h < 2T$. For the restricted version of the problem, where for each job $j$ and machine $i$, $p_{ij} \in \{p_j, \infty\}$, we show that a simpler algorithm yields a better bound, thus improving for highly feasible instances the best known ratio of $33/17 + ε$, for any fixed $ε>0$, due to Svensson.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.