Abstract

In the discrete kk-center problem, we are given a metric space (P,dist)(P,\texttt{dist}) where ∣P∣=n|P|=n and the goal is to select a set C⊆PC\subseteq P of kk centers which minimizes the maximum distance of a point in PP from its nearest center. For any ε>0ε>0, Agarwal and Procopiuc [SODA '98, Algorithmica '02] designed an (1+ε)(1+ε)-approximation algorithm for this problem in dd-dimensional Euclidean space which runs in O(dnlog⁡k)+(kε)O(k1−1/d)⋅nO(1)O(dn\log k) + \left(\dfrac{k}ε\right)^{O\left(k^{1-1/d}\right)}\cdot n^{O(1)} time. In this paper we show that their algorithm is essentially optimal: if for some d≥2d\geq 2 and some computable function ff, there is an f(k)⋅(1ε)o(k1−1/d)⋅no(k1−1/d)f(k)\cdot \left(\dfrac{1}ε\right)^{o\left(k^{1-1/d}\right)} \cdot n^{o\left(k^{1-1/d}\right)} time algorithm for (1+ε)(1+ε)-approximating the discrete kk-center on nn points in dd-dimensional Euclidean space then the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. We obtain our lower bound by designing a gap reduction from a dd-dimensional constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) defined by Marx and Sidiropoulos [SoCG '14] to discrete dd-dimensional kk-center. As a byproduct of our reduction, we also obtain that the exact algorithm of Agarwal and Procopiuc [SODA '98, Algorithmica '02] which runs in nO(d⋅k1−1/d)n^{O\left(d\cdot k^{1-1/d}\right)} time for discrete kk-center on nn points in dd-dimensional Euclidean space is asymptotically optimal. Formally, we show that if for some d≥2d\geq 2 and some computable function ff, there is an f(k)⋅no(k1−1/d)f(k)\cdot n^{o\left(k^{1-1/d}\right)} time exact algorithm for the discrete kk-center problem on nn points in dd-dimensional Euclidean space then the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Previously, such a lower bound was only known for d=2d=2 and was implicit in the work of Marx [IWPEC '06]. [see paper for full abstract]

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.