Paper detail

Tight List-Sizes for Oblivious AVCs under Constraints

We study list-decoding over adversarial channels governed by oblivious adversaries (a.k.a. oblivious Arbitrarily Varying Channels (AVCs)). This type of adversaries aims to maliciously corrupt the communication without knowing the actual transmission from the sender. For any oblivious AVCs potentially with constraints on the sender's transmitted sequence and the adversary's noise sequence, we determine the exact value of the minimum list-size that can support a reliable communication at positive rate. This generalizes a classical result by Hughes (IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1997) and answers an open question posed by Sarwate and Gastpar (IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2012). A lower bound on the list-decoding capacity (whenever positive) is presented. Under a certain combinatorial conjecture, we also prove a matching upper bound. En route to a tight characterization of the list-decoding capacity, we propose a method for subcode construction towards the resolution of the combinatorial conjecture.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.