Paper detail

Tight detection efficiency bounds of Bell tests in no-signaling theories

No-signaling theories, which can contain nonlocal correlations stronger than classical correlations but limited by the no-signaling condition, have deepened our understanding of the quantum theory. In principle, the nonlocality of these theories can be verified via Bell tests. In practice, however, inefficient detectors may make Bell tests unreliable, which is called the detection efficiency loophole. In this work, we show almost tight lower and upper bounds of the detector efficiency requirement for demonstrating the nonlocality of no-signaling theories, by designing a general class of Bell tests. In particular, we show tight bounds for two scenarios: the bipartite case and the multipartite case with a large number of parties. To some extent, these tight efficiency bounds quantify the nonlocality of no-signaling theories. Furthermore, our result shows that the detector efficiency can be arbitrarily low even for Bell tests with two parties, by increasing the number of measurement settings. Our work also sheds light on the detector efficiency requirement for showing the nonlocality of the quantum theory.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.