Paper detail

Tight Bounds on Information Dissemination in Sparse Mobile Networks

Motivated by the growing interest in mobile systems, we study the dynamics of information dissemination between agents moving independently on a plane. Formally, we consider $k$ mobile agents performing independent random walks on an $n$-node grid. At time $0$, each agent is located at a random node of the grid and one agent has a rumor. The spread of the rumor is governed by a dynamic communication graph process ${G_t(r) | t \geq 0}$, where two agents are connected by an edge in $G_t(r)$ iff their distance at time $t$ is within their transmission radius $r$. Modeling the physical reality that the speed of radio transmission is much faster than the motion of the agents, we assume that the rumor can travel throughout a connected component of $G_t$ before the graph is altered by the motion. We study the broadcast time $T_B$ of the system, which is the time it takes for all agents to know the rumor. We focus on the sparse case (below the percolation point $r_c \approx \sqrt{n/k}$) where, with high probability, no connected component in $G_t$ has more than a logarithmic number of agents and the broadcast time is dominated by the time it takes for many independent random walks to meet each other. Quite surprisingly, we show that for a system below the percolation point the broadcast time does not depend on the relation between the mobility speed and the transmission radius. In fact, we prove that $T_B = \tilde{O}(n / \sqrt{k})$ for any $0 \leq r < r_c$, even when the transmission range is significantly larger than the mobility range in one step, giving a tight characterization up to logarithmic factors. Our result complements a recent result of Peres et al. (SODA 2011) who showed that above the percolation point the broadcast time is polylogarithmic in $k$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.