Abstract

In the classic maximum coverage problem, we are given subsets T1,…,TmT_1, \dots, T_m of a universe [n][n] along with an integer kk and the objective is to find a subset S⊆[m]S \subseteq [m] of size kk that maximizes C(S):=∣∪i∈STi∣C(S) := |\cup_{i \in S} T_i|. It is well-known that the greedy algorithm for this problem achieves an approximation ratio of (1−e−1)(1-e^{-1}) and there is a matching inapproximability result. We note that in the maximum coverage problem if an element e∈[n]e \in [n] is covered by several sets, it is still counted only once. By contrast, if we change the problem and count each element ee as many times as it is covered, then we obtain a linear objective function, C(∞)(S)=∑i∈S∣Ti∣C^{(\infty)}(S) = \sum_{i \in S} |T_i|, which can be easily maximized under a cardinality constraint. We study the maximum ℓ\ell-multi-coverage problem which naturally interpolates between these two extremes. In this problem, an element can be counted up to ℓ\ell times but no more; hence, we consider maximizing the function C(ℓ)(S)=∑e∈[n]min⁡{ℓ,∣{i∈S:e∈Ti}∣}C^{(\ell)}(S) = \sum_{e \in [n]} \min\{\ell, |\{i \in S : e \in T_i\}| \}, subject to the constraint ∣S∣≤k|S| \leq k. Note that the case of ℓ=1\ell = 1 corresponds to the standard maximum coverage setting and ℓ=∞\ell = \infty gives us a linear objective. We develop an efficient approximation algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio of 1−ℓℓe−ℓℓ!1 - \frac{\ell^{\ell}e^{-\ell}}{\ell!} for the ℓ\ell-multi-coverage problem. In particular, when ℓ=2\ell = 2, this factor is 1−2e−2≈0.731-2e^{-2} \approx 0.73 and as ℓ\ell grows the approximation ratio behaves as 1−12πℓ1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2π\ell}}. We also prove that this approximation ratio is tight, i.e., establish a matching hardness-of-approximation result, under the Unique Games Conjecture.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.