Paper detail

Tides and Tidal Engulfment in Post-Main Sequence Binaries: Period Gaps for Planets and Brown Dwarfs Around White Dwarfs

The presence of a close, low-mass companion is thought to play a substantial and perhaps necessary role in shaping post-Asymptotic Giant Branch and Planetary Nebula outflows. During post-main-sequence evolution, radial expansion of the primary star, accompanied by intense winds, can significantly alter the binary orbit via tidal dissipation and mass loss. To investigate this, we couple stellar evolution models (from the zero-age main-sequence through the end of the post-main sequence) to a tidal evolution code. The binary's fate is determined by the initial masses of the primary and the companion, the initial orbit (taken to be circular), and the Reimers mass-loss parameter. For a range of these parameters, we determine whether the orbit expands due to mass loss or decays due to tidal torques. Where a common envelope (CE) phase ensues, we estimate the final orbital separation based on the energy required to unbind the envelope. These calculations predict period gaps for planetary and brown dwarf companions to white dwarfs. The upper end of the gap is the shortest period at which a CE phase is avoided. The lower end is the longest period at which companions survive their CE phase. For binary systems with 1 $M_\odot$ progenitors, we predict no Jupiter-mass companions with periods $\lesssim$270 days. Once engulfed, Jupiter-mass companions do not survive a CE phase. For binary systems consisting of a 1 $M_\odot$ progenitor with a companion 10 times the mass of Jupiter, we predict a period gap between $\sim$0.1 and $\sim$380 days. These results are consistent with both the detection of a $\sim$50 $M_{\rm J}$ brown dwarf in a $\sim$0.003 AU ($\sim$0.08 day) orbit around the white dwarf WD 0137-349 and the tentative detection of a $\sim$2 $M_{\rm J}$ planet in a $\gtrsim$2.7 AU ($\gtrsim$4 year) orbit around the white dwarf GD66.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.