Paper detail

Tidal radii of main sequence stars -- III. Partial disruptions

In this paper, the third in this series, we continue our study of tidal disruption events of main-sequence stars by a non-spinning $10^{6}~\rm{M}_\odot$ supermassive black hole. Here we focus on the outcomes of partial disruptions. As the encounter becomes weaker, the debris mass is increasingly concentrated near the outer edges of the energy distribution. As a result, the mass fallback rate can deviate substantially from a $t^{-5/3}$ power-law, becoming more like a single peak with a tail declining as $t^{-p}$ with $p\simeq2-5$. Surviving remnants are spun-up in the prograde direction and are hotter than MS stars of the same mass. Their specific orbital energy is $\simeq10^{-3}\times$ that of the debris (but of either sign with respect to the black hole potential) while their specific angular momentum is close to that of the original star. Even for strong encounters, remnants have speeds at infinity relative to the black hole potential $\lesssim 300$ km s$^{-1}$, so they are unable to travel far out into the galactic bulge. Remnants bound to the black hole can possibly go through a second tidal disruption event.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.