Paper detail

Tidal radii of main sequence stars -- I. Physical tidal radius, semi-analytic model and their implications

A star is tidally disrupted by a supermassive black hole when their separation is shorter than the "tidal radius". This quantity is often estimated on an order-of-magnitude basis without reference to the star's internal structure. Using MESA models for main sequence stars and fully general relativistic dynamics, we find the physical tidal radius for complete disruption $\cal{R}_t$ for a $10^6M_\odot$ black hole (BH). We find that across a factor $\sim20$ in stellar mass $M_*$, i.e., $0.15M_{\odot}\leq M_*\leq3M_\odot$, $\cal{R}_t\sim27\times$(BH's gravitational radius). When comparing $\cal{R}_t$ with the commonly used order-of-magnitude estimate $r_t$, we find that $\cal{R}_t\sim1.05-1.45r_t$ for $0.15M_\odot\leq M_*\leq0.5M_\odot$, but between $0.5 M_\odot$ and $1 M_\odot$, $\cal{R}_t$ drops to $\sim 0.45r_t$, and it remains at this value up to $10 M_\odot$. The near-constancy of $\cal{R}_t$ implies a weaker dependence of the full disruption rate on $M_*$ than when predicted with $r_t$. The characteristic energy width of the debris $ΔE$ ranges from $\sim1.2Δ\cal{E}$ for low-mass stars to $\sim 0.35Δ\cal{E}$ for higher-mass stars, where $Δ\cal{E}=GM_{\rm BH}R_*/\cal{R}_t^{2}$. We present analytic fits for the $M_*$ dependence of $\cal{R}_t$ and $ΔE$; these fits lead to analytic expressions for the time of peak mass fallback rate and the maximal mass fallback rate. Our results also bear on the fraction of events leading to fast or slow circularization, as well as on the character of the tidal event occurring when the remnant of a partial disruption returns to the black hole. Using a semi-analytic model, we show that $\cal{R}_t$ is primarily determined by the star's central density rather than its mean density. For high-mass stars, the full disruption rate is roughly 1/4 the partial disruption rate, while this ratio is close to unity for low-mass stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.