Paper detail

Tidal friction in satellites and planets. The new version of the creep tide theory

Paper on the creep tide theory and its applications to satellites and planets with emphasis on a new set of differential equations allowing easier numerical studies. The creep tide theory is a new paradigm that does not fix a priori the tidal deformation of the body, but considers the deformation as a low-Reynolds-number flow. The evolution under tidal forces is ruled by an approximate solution of the Navier-Stokes equation depending on the body's viscosity with no ad hoc assumptions on its shape and orientation. It reproduces closely the results of Darwinian theories in the case of gaseous planets and stars, but the results are completely different in the case of stiff satellites and planets. It explains the tidal dissipations of Enceladus and Mimas. The extension of the theory to nonhomogeneous icy satellites with a subsurface ocean allows the amplitude of the forced oscillations around synchronization (librations) to be better determined.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.