Paper detail

Tidal fragmentation as the origin of 1I/2017 U1 ('Oumuamua)

The first discovered interstellar object (ISO), `Oumuamua (1I/2017 U1) shows a dry and rocky surface, an unusually elongated short-to-long axis ratio $c/a \lesssim 1/6$, a low velocity relative to the local standard of rest ($\sim 10$ km s$^{-1}$), non-gravitational accelerations, and tumbles on a few hours timescale. The inferred number density ($\sim 3.5 \times 10^{13} - 2 \times 10^{15}$ pc$^{-3}$) for a population of asteroidal ISOs outnumbers cometary ISOs by $\geq 10^3$, in contrast to the much lower ratio ($\lesssim 10^{-2}$) of rocky/icy Kuiper belt objects. Although some scenarios can cause the ejection of asteroidal ISOs, a unified formation theory has yet to comprehensively link all `Oumuamua's puzzling characteristics and to account for the population. Here we show by numerical simulations that `Oumuamua-like ISOs can be prolifically produced through extensive tidal fragmentation and ejected during close encounters of their volatile-rich parent bodies with their host stars. Material strength enhanced by the intensive heating during periastron passages enables the emergence of extremely elongated triaxial ISOs with shape $c/a \lesssim 1/10$, sizes $a \sim 100$ m, and rocky surfaces. Although volatiles with low sublimation temperature (such as CO) are concurrently depleted, H$_2$O buried under surfaces is preserved in these ISOs, providing an outgassing source without measurable cometary activities for `Oumuamua's non-gravitational accelerations during its passage through the inner Solar System. We infer that the progenitors of `Oumuamua-like ISOs may be km-sized long-period comets from Oort clouds, km-sized residual planetesimals from debris disks, or planet-size bodies at a few AU, orbiting around low-mass main-sequence stars or white dwarfs. These provide abundant reservoirs to account for `Oumuamua's occurrence rate.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.