Paper detail

Tidal effects on the radial velocity curve of HD77581 (Vela X-1)

The mass of the neutron star in Vela X-1 has been found to be more massive than the canonical 1.5 Mo. This result relies on the assumption that the amplitude of the optical component's measured radial velocity curve is not seriously affected by the interactions in the system. In this paper we explore the effect on the radial velocity curve caused by surface motions excited by tidal interactions. We use a calculation from first principles that involves solving the equations of motion of a Lagrangian grid of surface elements. The velocities on the visible surface of the star are projected along the line-of-sight to the observer to obtain the absorption-line profile in the observer's reference frame. The centroid of the line-profiles for different orbital phases is then measured and a simulated RV curve constructed. Models are run for the "standard" (vsini=116 km/s) and "slow" (56 km/s) supergiant rotation velocities. We find that the surface velocity field is complex and includes fast, small-spatial scale structures. It leads to strong variability in the photospheric line profiles which, in turn, causes significant deviations from a Keplerian RV curve. The peak-to-peak amplitudes of model RV curves are in all cases larger than the amplitude of the orbital motion. Keplerian fits to RV curves obtained with the "standard" rotation velocity imply a neutron star >1.7 Mo. However, a similar analysis of the "slow" rotational velocity models allows for m_ns ~ 1.5 Mo. Thus, the stellar rotation plays an important role in determining the characteristics of the perturbed RV curve. Given the observational uncertainty in GP Vel's projected rotation velocity and the strong perturbations seen in the published and the model RV curves, we are unable to rule out a small (~1.5 Mo) mass for the neutron star companion.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.