Paper detail

Tidal distortion and disruption of rubble-pile bodies revisited -- Soft-sphere discrete element analyses

During close approaches to planets or stars, the morphological and dynamical properties of rubble-pile small bodies can be modified, and some may catastrophically break up. This phenomenon is of particular interest for understanding the evolution and population of small bodies, and for making predictions for future encounters. Previous numerical explorations typically used methods that do not adequately represent the nature of rubble piles. The encounter outcomes and influence factors are still poorly constrained. Based on recent advances in modeling rubble piles, we aim to provide a better understanding of the tidal encounter processes through soft-sphere discrete element modeling (SSDEM) and to establish a database of encounter outcomes and the dependencies on encounter conditions and rubble-pile properties. We performed thousands of numerical simulations using the SSDEM implemented in the N-body code pkdgrav to study the dynamical evolution of rubble piles during close encounters with the Earth. The effects of encounter conditions, material strength, arrangement, and resolution of constituent particles are explored. Three typical tidal encounter outcomes are classified, i.e., deformation, mass shedding, and disruption, ranging from mild modifications to severe damages of the progenitor. The encounter speed and distance required for causing disruption events are much smaller than those predicted by previous studies, indicating a smaller creation rate of tidally disrupted small body populations. Extremely elongated fragments with axis ratios ~1:6 can be formed by moderate encounters. Our analyses of the spin-shape evolution of the largest remnants reveal reshaping mechanisms of rubble piles in response to tidal forces, consistent with stable rubble-pile configurations derived by continuum theory. A case study for SL9 suggests a low bulk density (0.2-0.3 g/cc) for its progenitor.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.