Paper detail

Tidal Disruption Events by Compact Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

Stars can be tidally destroyed or swallowed by supermassive black hole binaries. Using a large number of accurate few-body simulations, we investigate the enhancement and suppression of full and partial disruption and direct capture events by hard supermassive black hole binaries with a wide ranges of key parameters, i.e., the primary black hole mass ($10^{5}-10^{8}M_{\odot}$), the binary mass ratio ($10^{-3}-1$), the ratio of the binary semimajor axis to the hardening radius ($10^{-4}-1$), the binary eccentricity ($0.0-0.9$) and the stellar mass ($0.3-3M_{\odot}$). This is a significant extension of the parameter space compared to previous work. We show that the encounter probabilities of all three events are well-described by the encounter cross section, which is proportional to the pericenter distance. The probability of full disruptions by supermassive black hole binaries can be enhanced by up to a factor of $40-50$ or suppressed by up to a factor of $10$, relative to that by single black holes, depending on the binary parameters. Relativistic effects are not important for the primary black hole mass $\leq 10^{7}M_{\odot}$, but can provide an additional enhancement of the full disruption probability by less than a factor of $2-3$ for higher primary black hole masses. We provide a fitting formula for the full disruption probability by the hard supermassive black hole binaries that works for a wide range of parameters. We also find that partial disruption events can occur multiple times before full disruptions or direct captures, and their probabilities can be greater than that of full disruption events by a factor of three. Because partial disruption events can induce stellar spins and mass loss and change the orbits, it can significantly affect the overall full disruption event rate and the shape of the light curves.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.