Paper detail

Tidal and general relativistic effects in rocky planet formation at the substellar mass limit using N-body simulations

Recent observational results show that very low mass stars and brown dwarfs are able to host close-in rocky planets. Low-mass stars are the most abundant stars in the Galaxy and the formation efficiency of their planetary systems is relevant in the computation of a global probability of finding Earth-like planets inside habitable zones. Tidal forces and relativistic effects are relevant in the latest dynamical evolution of planets around low-mass stars and their effect on the planetary formation efficiency still needs to be addressed. Our goal is to evaluate the impact of tidal forces and relativistic effects on the formation of rocky planets around a star close to the substellar mass limit, in terms of the resulting planetary architectures and its distribution according to the corresponding evolving habitable zone. Thus, we performed a set of $N$-body simulations spanning the first 100~Myr of the evolution of two systems composed respectively by 224 embryos with a total mass 0.25M$_\oplus$ and 74 embryos with a total mass 3 M$_\oplus$ around a central object of 0.08~M$_\odot$. For these two scenarios, we compared the planetary architectures that result from simulations that are purely gravitational with those from simulations that include the early contraction and spin-up of the central object, the distortions and dissipation tidal terms and general relativistic effects. We found that including these effects allows the formation and survival of a close-in population located in the habitable zone of the system. This means that both effects are relevant during the formation of rocky planets and their early evolution around stars close to the substellar mass limit, in particular when low-mass planetary embryos are involved.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.