Paper detail

TIAger: Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Scoring in Breast Cancer for the TiGER Challenge

The quantification of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been shown to be an independent predictor for prognosis of breast cancer patients. Typically, pathologists give an estimate of the proportion of the stromal region that contains TILs to obtain a TILs score. The Tumor InfiltratinG lymphocytes in breast cancER (TiGER) challenge, aims to assess the prognostic significance of computer-generated TILs scores for predicting survival as part of a Cox proportional hazards model. For this challenge, as the TIAger team, we have developed an algorithm to first segment tumor vs. stroma, before localising the tumor bulk region for TILs detection. Finally, we use these outputs to generate a TILs score for each case. On preliminary testing, our approach achieved a tumor-stroma weighted Dice score of 0.791 and a FROC score of 0.572 for lymphocytic detection. For predicting survival, our model achieved a C-index of 0.719. These results achieved first place across the preliminary testing leaderboards of the TiGER challenge.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.