Paper detail

Throughput of One-Hop Wireless Networks with Noisy Feedback Channel

In this paper, we consider the effect of feedback channel error on the throughput of one-hop wireless networks under the random connection model. The transmission strategy is based on activating source-destination pairs with strongest direct links. While these activated pairs are identified based on Channel State Information (CSI) at the receive side, the transmit side will be provided with a noisy version of this information via the feedback channel. Such error will degrade network throughput, as we investigate in this paper. Our results show that if the feedback error probability is below a given threshold, network can tolerate such error without any significant throughput loss. The threshold value depends on the number of nodes in the network and the channel fading distribution. Such analysis is crucial in design of error correction codes for feedback channel in such networks.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.