Paper detail

Throughput and Collision Analysis of Multi-Channel Multi-Stage Spectrum Sensing Algorithms

Multi-stage sensing is a novel concept that refers to a general class of spectrum sensing algorithms that divide the sensing process into a number of sequential stages. The number of sensing stages and the sensing technique per stage can be used to optimize performance with respect to secondary user throughput and the collision probability between primary and secondary users. So far, the impact of multi-stage sensing on network throughput and collision probability for a realistic network model is relatively unexplored. Therefore, we present the first analytical framework which enables performance evaluation of different multi-channel multi-stage spectrum sensing algorithms for Opportunistic Spectrum Access networks. The contribution of our work lies in studying the effect of the following parameters on performance: number of sensing stages, physical layer sensing techniques and durations per each stage, single and parallel channel sensing and access, number of available channels, primary and secondary user traffic, buffering of incoming secondary user traffic, as well as MAC layer sensing algorithms. Analyzed performance metrics include the average secondary user throughput and the average collision probability between primary and secondary users. Our results show that when the probability of primary user mis-detection is constrained, the performance of multi-stage sensing is, in most cases, superior to the single stage sensing counterpart. Besides, prolonged channel observation at the first stage of sensing decreases the collision probability considerably, while keeping the throughput at an acceptable level. Finally, in realistic primary user traffic scenarios, using two stages of sensing provides a good balance between secondary users throughput and collision probability while meeting successful detection constraints subjected by Opportunistic Spectrum Access communication.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.