Paper detail

Through a Lens Darkly: Evidence for Dusty Gravitational Lenses

Foreground galaxies that amplify the light from background quasars may also dim that light if the galaxies contain enough dust. Extinction by dust in lenses could hide the large number of lensed systems predicted for a flat universe with a large value of the cosmological constant $Λ$. We look for one signature of dust, namely reddening, by examining optical-infrared colors of gravitationally lensed images of quasars. We find that the lensed systems identified in radio and infrared searches have redder optical-IR colors than optically selected ones. This could be due to a bias against selecting reddened (hence extincted) quasars in the optical surveys, or due to the differences in the intrinsic colors of optical and radio quasars. Comparison of the radio-selected lensed and unlensed quasars shows that the lensed ones have redder colors. We therefore conclude that at least part of the color difference between the two lens samples is due to dust. From the color difference between lensed and unlensed radio quasars (and assuming Galactic extinction law) we can reconcile a large cosmological constant ($Λ=0.9$) with the number of lensed systems observed in flux limited optical surveys. These results substantially weaken the strongest constraint on cosmological scenarios that invoke a non-zero cosmological constant to explain age discrepancy problems, satisfy predictions of inflationary models of the early universe and play a role in large scale structure formation models. They also raise the prospect of using gravitational lenses to study the interstellar medium in high redshift galaxies.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.