Paper detail

Thresholds on star formation and the chemical evolution of galactic discs: cosmochronology and the age of the galaxy

In this paper we analyse different chronometers based on the models of chemical evolution developed in Chamcham, Pitts \& Tayler (1993; hereafter CPT) and Chamcham \& Tayler (1994; hereafter CT). In those papers we discussed the ability of our models to reproduce the observed G-dwarf distribution in the solar neighbourhood, age-metallicity relation and radial chemical abundance gradients. We now examine their response to the predictions of cosmochronology. We use the recent production ratios of the actinide pairs $^{235}$U/$^{238}$U and $^{232}$Th/$^{238}$U provided by Cowan, Thielemann \& Truran (1991) and the observed abundance ratios from Anders \& Grevesse (1989) to determine the duration of nucleosynthesis in the solar neighbourhood, and thus to determine maximum likelihood estimates and confidence intervals for the infall parameter, $β$, which controls the growth rate of the disc in our models. We compare our predictions for the age of the disc with the age of the galaxy estimated from models of white dwarf cooling and from the age of globular clusters. From our statistical analysis we find that these three methods of age prediction appear to be consistent for a range of maximum likelihood values of $β$ which is in good agreement with the values considered in CPT and CT, which were found to give a good fit to the observational data examined in those papers. We also briefly consider the consistency of our results with the age of the universe predicted in different cosmological models -- a topic which we will investigate more fully in future work.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.