Paper detail

Threshold Star Formation Effects in the Peculiar Galaxy Arp~10 (=~VV 362)

We present images of the peculiar galaxy Arp~10 which reveal two rings of concurrent star formation. Apart from a bright ring visible on early photographs of the system, an even brighter inner ring of \ion{H}{2} regions is found within the nuclear bulge of the galaxy. A very faint ring-arc of \ion{H}{2} regions is also seen associated with a third outer ring or shell. An investigation of the H$α$ fluxes in the rings reveals an increase in the emission where the ring surface density in the R-band light exceeds 21.3$\pm$0.2 mag arcsec$^{-2}$. If the R-band light is dominated by old stars in the underlying density wave, then the results suggest evidence for a Star Formation law which exhibits a threshold dependence on the strength of the density wave in the rings. Even if the R-band continuum in the ring is heavily contaminated with red light from the underlying young stars then a smaller, but still significant non-linear enhancement in the star formation rates (SFR) in one segment of the second ring is required to explain the results. In either case, strong trends in the SFR with azimuth around Ring~2 are in good agreement with off-center collisional ring galaxy models.

preprint1993arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.