Paper detail

Threshold-Secure Coding with Shared Key

Cryptographic protocols are often implemented at upper layers of communication networks, while error-correcting codes are employed at the physical layer. In this paper, we consider utilizing readily-available physical layer functions, such as encoders and decoders, together with shared keys to provide a threshold-type security scheme. To this end, we first consider a scenario where the effect of the physical layer is omitted and all the channels between the involved parties are assumed to be noiseless. We introduce a model for threshold-secure coding, where the legitimate parties communicate using a shared key such that an eavesdropper does not get any information, in an information-theoretic sense, about the key as well as about any subset of the input symbols of size up to a certain threshold. Then, a framework is provided for constructing threshold-secure codes from linear block codes while characterizing the requirements to satisfy the reliability and security conditions. Moreover, we propose a threshold-secure coding scheme, based on Reed-Muller (RM) codes, that meets security and reliability conditions. It is shown that the encoder and the decoder of the scheme can be implemented efficiently with quasi-linear time complexity. In particular, a successive cancellation decoder is shown for the RM-based coding scheme. Then we extend the setup to the scenario where the channel between the legitimate parties is no longer noiseless. The reliability condition for noisy channels is then modified accordingly, and a method is described to construct codes attaining threshold security as well as desired reliability. Also, we propose a coding scheme based on RM codes for threshold security and robustness designed for binary erasure channels along with a unified successive cancellation decoder. The proposed threshold-secure coding schemes are flexible and can be adapted for different key lengths.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.